The climate number that survives an investment committee
Exposure in euro, remediation costed from completed projects, and the effect on the hold. Across the portfolio on one basis, so assets are actually comparable.
Four moments where the question becomes financial
Where portfolio teams tell us a colour band stops being enough.
ULI and LaSalle report that an exit cap rate discount for estimated physical risk is now commonly applied, frequently at 25 to 50 basis points. On a €46 m asset at a 5 per cent cap rate, 25 basis points is roughly €2,2 m of value. The assessment costs a fraction of one basis point.
The committee asks what it costs and what it does to the exit. A hazard score answers neither. Exposure has to arrive as money, with the cost of fixing it beside it.
Appendix A requires a climate risk and vulnerability assessment with adaptation solutions and, where risk is material, a plan. An auditor will challenge it, which means the method has to be legible.
RM6.3 and RM6.4 now require asset level evidence with entity reference, and partial credit is gone. Lenders ask the same questions at renewal.
Comparable across the portfolio, defensible on the single asset
One assessment basis, used at four different moments.
Value at risk in euro, adaptation cost against risk reduction, and the effect on exit assumptions. Written to support a decision rather than to describe a hazard.
Screening, materiality, assessment of adaptation solutions and a costed plan. Steps one to five satisfied, with the monitoring framework covered by annual reassessment.
Every asset in the reference set has passed through the same four layers, so percentiles mean something. The distribution itself is reported, because a bimodal peril behaves differently from a smooth one.
Capex, avoided cost, return multiple and break-even decade per measure, from roughly 1 500 completed European renovation projects.
Measures bound to the asset, not to a category
Where a model exists, every measure is scoped to named elements with quantities taken from geometry. That is what turns a recommendation into a capital line.
Nine measures, ranked by return
How a portfolio engagement runs
Which assets, which decisions, and which frameworks the output has to serve. Most portfolios need Taxonomy, GRESB and transaction support from the same assessment.
Every asset through the same four layers, so the portfolio is comparable and the outliers are real rather than artefacts of method.
Hazard layers are revised, the peer set grows and insurance conditions move faster than either. Annual reassessment also satisfies the Appendix A monitoring requirement.
Our hazard layer is the one ranked first in the world
We license physical hazard data from Moody's, named number one overall provider in the inaugural Chartis Physical and Infrastructure Risk50 2025, published 9 December 2025, together with eight category wins and benchmarked against a named field of fifty.
Depth by decision, not by policy
Portfolio reporting runs at the data licence level. A transaction or an investment committee paper usually justifies the model based or surveyed level on the asset in question.
| Level | What it is | Price | Hazard data | Signed report | BIM scoping | Site visit | BI and insurance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data licence | Hazard and vulnerability inside the platform | €280 to €350 per asset per year portfolio only, from 25 assets | ✓ | · | · | · | · |
| Assessment report | Signed for a named scheme or purpose | €450 per asset one time, paid by card | ✓ | ✓ | · | · | · |
| Model based | Scoped from your BIM or IFC model | €6 000 to €9 000 per asset one time | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | · | · |
| Surveyed | Model based, plus a site visit | €12 000 to €18 000 per asset one time | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | · |
| Full advisory | Interruption, insurance and negotiation | Quoted per engagement | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Portfolio licence is €280 to €350 per asset per year from 25 assets, with volume steps. A signed report on a single asset is €450. Transaction and investment committee work usually sits at the model based or surveyed level.
One asset, one fixed price, paid by card
No sales call, no quote and no subscription. The price on this page is the price you pay.
- Hazard exposure at the asset location, climate perils only, geophysical excluded
- Asset level vulnerability, not a hazard map
- Climate Value at Risk, expressed in euro
- Decadal horizons from 2030 to 2099
- EU Taxonomy aligned indicators
- Signed PDF report you can attach to a submission or a file
- 1Confirmation and invoice
Both reach you by email as soon as the payment goes through. Nothing else is charged.
- 2You send the asset address
Reply to that email with the address of the building. That is the only thing we need to start.
- 3We send the signed report
The analysis runs on the same four layers as every other assessment we issue, and the signed PDF comes back to the same address.
Straight answers
How is this different from the platform we already use?
Can the output go into an ESRS E1 disclosure?
What is excluded, and why does it matter?
Do you cover transition risk as well?
How current is the peer set?
With Blue Auditor, we digitized our portfolio of 2 000 energy performance certificates across over 700 properties and performed an ESG assessment within days. It supports us in ESG and portfolio optimization, a valuable partner for ESG compliance.
See a complete assessment before a call
A full specimen on a real assessed asset, forty two pages, including the peer positioning, the costed programme and the reliance statement.
- Exposure in euro, not in colours
- Costed measures with break-even by decade
- Sent to your work address within minutes